Airtel, Vodafone, Idea caused Rs 400 crore loss to govt: Reliance Jio

Airtel, Vodafone, Idea caused Rs 400 crore loss to govt: Reliance Jio
Standard

Airtel, Vodafone, Idea caused Rs 400 crore loss to govt: Reliance Jio

NEW DELHI: Reliance Jio has filed a complaint with the Ministry of Telecommunications claiming that it is up to Bharti Airtel, Vodafone and Idea have not submitted license fees required in March, resulting in a potential loss of Rs 400 million rupees for the government.
The company led by Mukesh Ambani claimed that Airtel, Vodafone India and Idea Cellular, in total violation of license rules “willingly and willingly pay the license fee in advance for the last quarter” from 2016-17 on the basis of The estimated gross adjusted income (AGR), which was much lower than “the condition of the license to pay the license fee at least the fees paid for the third quarter.”
According to the complaint, Airtel paid around Rs 950 crore as license fees from January-March 2017. The amount Jio claims, was Rs 150 crore less than Rs 1 crore 099.5 license fees paid by Airtel October to December 2017.
According to the rules, a telecommunications operator is required to pay license fees for the January-March period on the basis of expected revenues, but should not be less than the fees paid for the third quarter of the same year.
Similarly, Jio said, Vodafone paid Rs 550 crore, which was Rs 200 crore less compared to Rs 746.8 crore paid license fees in the third quarter. The idea has paid Rs 60 million rupees less expenses than Rs 609.4 rupees paid in the previous quarter, according to Reliance Jio.
“He said telecommunications service providers in place Law (TSP) caused potential financial losses of more than Rs 400 crore in government action and in any case resulted in a deficit of this amount in the year Fiscal 2016-17, “Jio claimed.
IBOC denied the allegation indicating that there would be no loss to the government since the AGR will be open to the state in the following quarter. “These accusations are both malicious and ironic, unfounded, if what we hear is the case of the media.” IBOC does not receive this kind of communication, “said the association’s CEO, Rajan S Mathews.
The Association of Cellular Operators of India (IBOC) asked the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to allow associated companies to pay license fees for the fourth quarter based on the AGR estimates instead of the estimated AGR increase for the period And the actual license fees paid in the third quarter due to alleged financial conditions for telecom operators.
Jio said that the point “did not adhere correctly” at the request of the IBOC, but learned that the ministry is considering the IBOC application, “which is certainly a flagrant violation of the license conditions and any relief would amount to rewarding a crime partly “.

Tejashwi resignation row: Expect Congress to intervene, says JD(U)

Standard

With the RJD, it is clear that Bihar Deputy CM Tejashwi Prasad Yadav will not resign for a corruption case filed against him, his alliance partner JD (T) is likely to have a call on the issue after the national party executive meeting In Delhi.

During his trip to Delhi, Bihar’s chief minister and leader of JD (T) Nitish Kumar is likely to meet Congress Speaker Sonia Gandhi. JD (T), as we have learned, hopes that Congress will satisfy RJD to soften its position.

National spokesman JD (T) C K Tyagi told The Indian Express: “We are preparing for the national leadership of the party meeting in New Delhi from July 22nd to 23rd.

As our agenda is already decided, the current political issues will also be taken into account. Nitish Kumar could also meet with AICC President Sonia Gandhi.

We hope that the Congress will intervene in Bihar, since it is our ally. ”

He said that the Great Alliance was better under the leadership and image of Nitish Kumar. “There must be a serious attempt by all the actors of the Great Alliance to find a solution to the dead end.

It is not a question of Nitishji compromising his moral authority, “Tyagi said, indicating a final call after the meeting if the RJD is not moving. So far, Congress has supported the RJD against CBI and ED incursions.

While the JD (T) has not expressly requested Tejashwi’s resignation, its leaders emphasized Nitish’s commitment to integrity and responsibility.

Addressing a meeting of party workers, Nitish said on the resignation of his government A B Vajpayee for moral reasons after the Gaisal accident in 1999.

He also recalled the resignations of BJP leader L K Advani and Sharad Yadav JD (T) in the hawala scam.

Meanwhile, the RJD has strengthened its position on the issue. The RJD MP, Virendra Kumar, said he would listen only to party leader Lalu Prasad. “We have 80 members and it is our leader Lalu Prasad.

What the JD (U) says or wants to convey is not important to us. We decided not to meet the demand for the Tejashwiji’s resignation. He was a victim of the BJP conspiracy. ”

Another high ranking RJD leader told The Indian Express that some of the party leaders are in favor of replacing Abdul Bari Siddiqui Tejashwi by either Lalu Yadav Tej Pratap son, but added, “n ‘there is not a single leader who has the Courage to say Lalu Prasad. “

The Latest: Police release names of father, 4 kids killed

The Latest: Police release names of father, 4 kids killed
Standard

The Latest: Police release names of father, 4 kids killed

The latest on the death of a man and four children outside of Atlanta (all local times):

19:25

Authorities have identified the father and four children who were fatally stabbed in a house on the outskirts of Atlanta.

Gwinnett County police cape. Michele Pihera identified the victims in a statement Thursday night, Martin Romero, 33, Isabela Martinez, 10, Dacota Romero, 7, Dillan Romero, 4, and Axel Romero 2 years. .

The mother of the children, Isabel Martinez, 33 years old, was arrested and charged in the murder.

The children and Martin Romero were found dead Thursday morning in a house in Loganville. A 9-year-old girl identified as Diana Romero Couces survived and remained in a serious but stable state in a hospital, Pihera said.

Police said Martinez was cooperating with investigators, but the motive for the crimes has not yet been published.
Atlanta Metropolitan Police have filed charges of murder against a mother suspected that she fatally stabbed four of her children and the child’s father.

The Gwinnett County Sheriff’s Office, said Isabel Martinez, 33, is being held without bail in the county jail. Authorities say Martinez faces five counts of low-vision murder, as well as five counts of murder and six counts of aggravated assault.

Police said the four children were under 10 and were found dead Thursday morning in a house in Loganville where the family lived. One girl survived, but was seriously injured.

Police reported that he had received a call to 911 from a woman who spoke Spanish and was inside the house. They believe that Martinez made the call.
Police say a mother suspects that four of her children were fatally beaten and the child’s father was the one who called 911 in Spanish to report crimes.

Gwinnett the Corporal of the Police. Michele Pihera to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution that the language barrier initially made communication difficult.

Police said the four children found dead Thursday morning were under 10. Another son, a daughter, survived the attack but was seriously injured and hospitalized. The father of the children, in his mid-30s, was also found dead.

Police issued a statement calling the mother a “suspect” in death. No fee has been announced.

Police said the first signs are that a knife was used in the attacks in the Loganville area. The community is east of Atlanta about 30 miles (48 km).
Police say a young woman who survived an attack that left four of her siblings and her father dead in a house in Georgia is still alive.

Police gave the update in a brief statement late Thursday morning after the bodies of four small children and their father were found inside a house in the Loganville area before dawn Thursday.

Police had issued a statement calling the “mother” to “suspects” in death and said the man found dead in the house was considered the father of the children.

Gwinnett County police cape. Michele Pihera told reporters that the mother was interviewed by detectives. No fee has been announced.

Police said the first signs are that a knife was used in the attacks.
Police said the four children were stabbed in a house on the outskirts of Atlanta were under 10 years old.

Police also issued a statement calling the mother of a “suspect” in death and said a man found dead in the house was his father.

Five things to watch for during Trump’s meeting with Putin

Five things to watch for during Trump's meeting with Putin
Standard

Five things to watch for during Trump’s meeting with Putin

Hamburg, Germany (CNN) All eyes will be on President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Poutine on Friday when the two world leaders will meet for the first time.

The official bilateral meeting Trump will bring face to face with the leader of the country that the United States of America were wrong during the 2016 elections in order to get Trump elected.

In recent days, Trump was presented with a large book of preparation equipment for his trip to Europe, but the section in his meeting with Putin only a few pages of paper, a White House official.

A second official said that each point of discussion is just a sentence or two long to keep Trump concentrating on his meeting.
Who’s going to be in the room when Trump meets Putin? 03:37
Behind the scenes, the advisors continue to express concern about Trump’s unpredictability before the meeting with Putin, particularly in the light of well-known practice Putin preparing many of his meetings with the leaders of the United States.

Everything from the body language Trump to Putin decides to say, in the public part of the brief meeting was dissected in the world. Americans and Russians see their world leaders closely but foreign powers hoping to gather information on how the new administration views Russia are the same.
Here’s what to keep in mind:

It is usually the end, not the substance, that defines a meeting like this.
As the two leaders do not show up? They will analyze language and behavior of the public part of the short meeting with Putin Trump body, tested again and then analyzed for days and weeks. Are they sitting or standing? Trump shaken Putin’s hand? Is Trump wearing his size to Mr. Putin? Or does Putin remain stoic and distant?

Trump realized optics had a bilateral meeting since his first visit to British Prime Minister Theresa May at the White House in January, where the president held May’s standing hand. Months later, Trump failed to shake the hand of German Chancellor Angela Merkel during their meeting at the Oval Office, general view that their relationship was frozen.

Trump was very nice in May, when he met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and the US Ambassador. Sergey Kislyak, at Putin’s request. Photos of the meeting showed Trump laughed, showing Kislyak Lavrov, and playing in the back.

Later, Trump revealed highly classified information at the meeting. But the purpose of the meeting has already consolidated the public view of Trump’s relationship with Russia: friendly.

Will not be allowed throughout the meeting with Putin Trump, so that the substance of what the two will discuss will be left to each government official readings and leaks coming from – the chambers – no wonder the room.

But the key question at the meeting is whether Trump will bring Russia’s electoral interference.

Trump, administration officials on CNN who he thought would focus mainly on litigation in Syria and Ukraine when he meets Putin on Friday. While no formal plan has yet emerged for the meeting, there is little hope that the US side that Trump will present Russian operations in 2016.

18 states sue Education Secretary DeVos for rescinding student protection rules

18 states sue Education Secretary DeVos for rescinding student protection rules
Standard

18 states sue Education Secretary DeVos for rescinding student protection rules

A coalition of 18 states and the District of Columbia continued Thursday Department of Education and Secretary Betsy DeVos for the cancellation of Obama-era rules to protect students from predatory schools.

The “defense of borrowers” rule – which should take effect on July 1 – has allowed borrowers to apply for student loans for a loan repayment if they were defrauded by for-profit schools.

It also largely prohibits schools participating in the federal student loan program to force students to use arbitration to resolve disputes and waive their class action rights.

The lawsuit alleges that the state’s Department of Education violated federal law by the rules of problems, which were terminated by the Obama administration in November.

Approximately 16,000 borrower defense applications are being processed, according to the Department of Education last month.

The Department of Education has canceled the rule “without requesting, receiving or responding to any comments from a speaker or a member of the public, and not participating in the public deliberation process,” according to the complaint states.

Millions of student loans could be directed to a reorganization in the coming months
Trump Administration to Review Student Loan Rules to Help Borrowers
It absorbs payment of $ 49 million to students for misleading advertising

In a statement, Department of Education press secretary Liz Hill described the complaint indicating an “ideologically motivated trial.”

History of the Association of Tour Operators IN THE UNITED STATES
Follow the common steps of explorers and entrepreneurs along the silk route
“Attorneys general say the state to regulate first and ask after legal,” he said.

The DeVos movement is based in part on a lawsuit filed in May by the Association of Private Post-Secondary Schools in California, which argued that the defending standards of borrowers beyond the legal authority of the Ministry of Education and have been designed With erroneous data. “The Ministry can not simply reject these accusations,” Hill said.

Trump administration clearly wanted to eliminate what it regards as so cumbersome regulation for the private sector.

Since taking the helm in the Department of Education earlier this year, DeVos, the daughter of Amway founder Richard DeVos, and a leading supporter of charter schools, remote rules student protection adopted by the Obama administration.

“From day one, Secretary DeVos has tagged with school principals to benefit students and families who drowned in unaffordable student loans,” said Attorney General Maura Healey, who led the study.

The Obama administration’s regulators have mostly focused their application on schools for fraudulent purposes that charge thousands of tuition and fees by making misleading or inaccurate statements about the prospects of graduates finding work in their fields studies.

For-profit schools rely heavily on federal student loans and grants. In 2009, education companies listed 15 in benefits on 86% of their income on loans financed by taxpayers, according to demand.

McConnell says GOP must shore up ACA insurance markets if Senate bill dies

McConnell says GOP must shore up ACA insurance markets if Senate bill dies
Standard

McConnell says GOP must shore up ACA insurance markets if Senate bill dies

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), A said Thursday that if his party fails to muster 50 votes for its plan to rewrite the Affordable Care Act, it will not be worth more than writing a bill Of more modest law with the Democrats to support existing insurance law markets.

Observations made at a Rotary Club luncheon in Glasgow, Ky., Represent a significant change for the veteran legislator.

Then raised the idea of ​​last week, Republicans may have to turn to Democrats if they can not pass their own bill, his words will mark the first time that explicitly raised the prospect appeasing the ACA.

“If my team can not agree on a suitable substitute, some sort of action in the private health insurance market has to happen,” McConnell said.

“No stock is an alternative. Insurance markets implode across the country, even in this state.”

McConnell, who pledged in 2014 to eradicate the law, known as a “comprehensive” Obamacare, first raised the possibility of working with the Democrats last week after taking a measure he had done in private.

This bill would eliminate the ACA requirement that most individuals prove they had health coverage, repeal or delay billions of taxes established under current law and make deep and long-term cuts in the country’s Medicaid program .
But when he said earlier that Republicans “need to find a solution” if they wanted a real change for the nation’s health care system, McConnell acknowledged Thursday how difficult it is to create an alternative that can satisfy and conservative GOP core camps.

His suggestion that he and his colleagues instead might try to strengthen the insurance exchanges created under the ACA contradicts Republican debate points that can not be repaired.

The markets were built for people who do not have access to affordable coverage through a job and now represent just over 10 million Americans who have purchased health plans through exchanges.

More than 8 out of 10 clients purchased their projects with federal funds provided by law.

So far, Congressional Republicans and the Trump administration have argued that the collapse of ACA markets is a major reason to wipe out much of the 2010 Act.
McConnell said Thursday in Glasgow, he continued to “twist the line” to strengthen the bill. But without Democrats ready to support him, he can not lose more than two of the 52 members of the caucus. Vice President Pence then vote, casting the vote against detachment.
A spokesman said Thursday night that there was “literally” no difference on McConnell this week and last week, when he said that “Republicans will agree and will change the status quo, or markets will continue to cede and that Will sit “with the Democrats.

“The two times he talked about something happen,” said Don Stewart. “His point was: The only way the Democrats work with us is [to] support Obamacare, do not fix it.”

However, the July 4 setbacks have not strengthened McConnell’s political outlook; Republican senators were captured from questions from participants concerned about the potential impact on their cover.

In recent days, some senators have suggested that considerable work would be needed before the Reconciliation Act better attention can pass through the Senate.

Government Ethics Chief Resigns, Casting Uncertainty Over Agency

Government Ethics Chief Resigns, Casting Uncertainty Over Agency
Standard

Government Ethics Chief Resigns, Casting Uncertainty Over Agency

WASHINGTON – Walter M. Shaub Jr., the leading ethics regulator for the government, has repeatedly clashed with the Trump administration over conflicts of interest, it said on Thursday it called.

Mr. Shaub’s five-year term as director of the Office of Government Ethics should not expire before January, but with little prospect of renewal and an attractive offer in the hands of a nonpartisan advocacy group, it was said that it was time to leave.

“There is not much else I could achieve in the Government Ethics Office, given the current situation,” Shaub said in an interview Thursday. “Recent experiences of O.G.E. have clarified that the ethics program should be strengthened.”
In a brief letter informing the President of Trump’s decision, Mr. Shaub has not proposed any concrete reason for his departure, but urged “the principle that public service is a public good, requiring employees to withhold The Constitution, laws and ethics are at the forefront of private benefit. ” He said he had not been forced to resign.
The White House quickly accepted Mr. Shaub’s resignation, and Lindsay E. Walters, a White House spokesman, said in a statement that the administration “appreciates their services.” M. Trump, he said, would propose a successor “in no time.”

From the scheduled time, Mr. Shaub gave Trump a chance to start marking the agency overseeing the federal government’s vast ethics program, including the White House.

The office manager has traditionally had ample freedom to set priorities, his tone in working with the White House and other federal agencies, and perhaps most importantly, how to interpret ethical laws.

The vacancy is almost certain to scare the Democrats and those in the small world of government ethics who view the desk as Mr. Shaub as an important political reinforcement against conflicts of interest at the upper levels of government.

For Trump supporters, who saw Mr. Shaub, a person designated by Obama as politically motivated, has been redesigned.

The intensity of the feeling of what is often a dark play speaks of the central role that ethics played in Washington from M. Trump, where the vast estates of the President and his cabinet, and the influx of business and cabinet advisors Of pressure, Ontario raised hasty accusations of conflicts of interest.

This is the work of the Ethics Office, creating a post-Watergate Congress to work with the ethics of the network responsible for each agency to help people entering the government to avoid potential conflicts.

The office guides each member government’s policies through disclosure requirements for financial information and creating agreements to restrict participation in the deliberations on matters that dealt with clients’ payment.

Mr. Shaub, 46, had faced an uncertain future in the agency since Mr. Trump took office in January. In the weeks between the president’s imperial victory and his inauguration, Mr. Shaub made an extraordinary bet:

It is very publicly recommended on Twitter, and in a rare public speech, Mr. Trump liquidate his extensive business and personal activities. This provision, according to Mr. Shaub was the only truly ethical choice.

M. Trump has ignored his advice, and by mid-January, Mr. Shaub thought it could be returned. To minimize his commitment to work, he packed up his personal belongings that filled his office.

Illinois Lawmakers Override Budget Veto, Ending Two-Year Stalemate

Illinois Lawmakers Override Budget Veto, Ending Two-Year Stalemate
Standard

Illinois Lawmakers Override Budget Veto, Ending Two-Year Stalemate

CHICAGO – After more than two years of political training, missed payments to creditors and falling credit ratings, Illinois made Thursday that most states do it every year. Finished a budget.

However, some state legislators and officials have managed to end the long stalemate of the state budget in the nation’s modern history, but there is at least one eminent critic and inflexible.

Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican who has clashed with the Democratic lawmaker since taking office, has vetoed the spending plan that includes a tax increase.

The governor has doubled his displeasure, although at least 10 members of his own party have joined the Democrats to override this veto, ending the stalemate.

“This is a two to four hit on the Illinois town front,” he said, this week, begging the Republicans to argue with him. “This tax increase will not solve any of our problems and, in fact, in the long run, this will aggravate our problems.”
The narrow cancellation of the veto in the state House, with exactly 71 required votes, ended a stagnation that has lasted so long that Illinois had dropped $ 15 billion in accounts and was warned its credit rating could Fall into the category of garbage, worse if any other state.

It was a defeat for M. Rauner, a former private equity executive who had never held a political position before the promise to “shake Springfield” and was elected governor in 2014.

As a conservative crusader in a democratic state with deep financial woes and one of the most underfunded pension systems in the country, he attacked public sector unions, demanded to limit politicians’ mandates, and called for changes to the durable pension system .

Now he is the second governor of the central region in recent weeks, with Sam Brownback of Kansas, to deal with an alternative supported by some in his own party.

In Kansas, where Republicans control the legislature, fellow Ms. Brownback turned against his tax cut philosophy last month. In both states, at least some Republican lawmakers have sent a message to their fiscally conservative leaders: they have reached their limit.

The Illinois result has raised questions about the political future of M. Rauner, now abandoned by former allies and apparently surrounded by growing growth of aspiring Democratic governors – including some with prominent names such as the Pritzker and Kennedy.

Among the supporters, Mr Rauner’s fierce opposition to a tax increase, unless it included other elements of his agenda – freezing property taxes, reducing workers’ compensation, statute of limitations – was seen As an example of a collision with the agreement of principles with crushing pressure. He also unveiled a point of discussion for the 2018 campaign against Democrats who crossed the stage.

“No one wins the next round on a tax increase,” said Pat Brady, former chairman of the Illinois Republican Party. “The governor went ahead.”

For critics – including some Republican lawmakers who challenged him – Mr Rauner’s position was seen as a reflection of his refusal to acknowledge that state finances had disappeared and his unwillingness to consider a compromise.

Some have referred to “The Undesired Governor,” suggesting that Mr. Rauner should be blamed if the state’s credit rating was degraded.

Protesters seek to impede summit as G-20 gets underway in Hamburg

Protesters seek to impede summit as G-20 gets underway in Hamburg
Standard

Protesters seek to impede summit as G-20 gets underway in Hamburg

HAMBURG – The economic summit of the Group of 20 began Friday in this port city in northern Germany following clashes between protesters and police who could send waves during the two-day meeting.

The German security forces used water cannons and peppers to prepare an anti-capitalist march in which a group of anarchist sympathies had a significant presence.

The skirmish followed a one-hour passage next to the port of Hamburg, where protesters tried to cross a public square to the conference center, where German Chancellor Angela Merkel welcomes foreign leaders including Trump’s president .

An afternoon concert will be held at the Elbphilharmonie, a jewel in the crown of a city that is among the richest in the country and is still loaded with above-average unemployment.

Leftists who want to draw attention to climate change, labor rights and the plight of refugees – among other causes – have agreed to cut short the first day of the summit.

They planned to block three main sites in the city, through civil disobedience to thwart an attempt by the authorities to coordinate the outskirts of Hamburg connecting the most important sites for hotels and at the airport.
Issues related to security, freedom of expression and a democratic meeting – newly relevant together with a summit, while being traditionally dedicated to the economy, can also highlight different approaches to human rights and the rule of law.

Merkel, who chairs the summit, said she would focus on climate change, free trade and a common obligation to help refugees.

His critics say his policies are part of the problem.

“This week is the austerity of Merkel that goes globally through the G-20,” said Jan van Aken, a member of the German parliament representing the Die Linke Party on more left.

He criticized the German government to try to control the protests, saying its approach was autocratic and that “Erdogan, Putin and Trump would feel at home” – a reference to Turkish leader Tayyip Erdogan and Russian President Vladimir Poutine and the American leader.

The government is sensitive to this.

“The main problem is that the top is again, after Brisbane, in a democracy,” said Wolfgang Schmidt, a Hamburg politician involved in the preparations for the summit. The summits in Turkey and China attended the 2014 meeting in Australia.

“You want to make sure that the protest of views and opinions to the contrary are heard, but also necessary to maintain security, and with 42 highly protected heads of state and ministers of finance and foreign affairs, is a challenge” .
The security challenge has focused quickly on Thursday night. When police tried to separate a group of militants from the “black bloc” of some 12,000 people who gathered to protest economic inequality and greed, authorities found a shower of stones and bottles.

As the police rushed the group, some demonstrators fled. But a phalanx of activists dressed in black clothes, hidden faces, stood up. They carried placards that condemned the state and said “Welcome to hell.”

Armored vehicles that sent powerful water discharges were rolling towards the demonstrators. Smoke bombs exploded in the crowd.

Police made some arrests, but said Thursday night that they had no final count. They said that 15 agents were injured, two of whom were hospitalized. A furniture store and a bank were damaged, police said.

The doctors could see the treatment of the injured in the event.

What the idea of civilization does (and doesn’t) mean to Trump

What the idea of civilization does (and doesn’t) mean to Trump
Standard

What the idea of civilization does (and doesn’t) mean to Trump

Want a smart analysis of the most important news in your inbox every day of the week with other global readings, ideas and interesting opinions you know? Sign up for the WorldView newsletter today.
It is no coincidence that President Trump chose the Polish capital to offer his latest Jeremiad on the dangers facing the West.

The nationalist government of the country in this gave the American leader a platform to plant their flag before this can be an irritable summit of the Group of 20 in Germany.

The ruling party of Poland hired Trump supporters in the country’s rural Warsaw – a movement familiar to the most populist men.

“A large crowd with Polish and American flags gathered in the square to Trump’s statements,” my colleagues wrote. “At least one person waved flag ‘make United States Big Again’ campaign, and another waved a Confederate flag.”

Then Trump spoke about what is now a familiar topic. He warned against the dangers facing his country and Europe, especially those of Islamic extremism and immigration. They are, in your mind, existential challenges. “The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive,” Trump said.
This near-apocalyptic sense of fatalism possessed Trump rhetoric for months, even during his inaugural address, which invokes the specter of “American carnage.” His message is the perennial fear of a dark and dangerous world.

Undisguised hostility toward Islam and immense immigrants seems deeply rooted among White House nationalist ideologues, including Stephen K. Advisors

Bannon and Stephen Miller, who wrote the last speech. In an essay published last year, Michael Anton, director of communications for the National Security Council, suggested that increasing immigration in a country is a sign of “a people, a civilization that wants to die.”

In Warsaw, Trump has called for nationalism and blood on the floor and Christian triumphalism that defines its brand policy and one of the far right in Europe.

“We can have the biggest economies and the deadliest weapons on Earth. But if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive,” he said.
“I declare today that the world understands that the West will never break,” Trump said in a final form of bravado. “Our values ​​prevail, our people prosper, and our civilization will triumph.”

But what values? Which people? And what civilization? Trump, after all, said that his vision of the West is different from that invoked by the establishment in force.

“I’m going to work with our allies to revitalize Western values ​​and institutions,” Trump said during the election campaign last April.

“Instead of trying to spread” universal values ​​”that everyone disagrees with, we must understand that the strengthening and promotion of Western civilization and its achievements inspire more positive reforms in the world than military interventions.”

No announcements found